Your basket is empty
Publication proposals are submitted to the FUP Editorial Board by the Editorial Manager, together with an initial editorial, technical and economic evaluation. The FUP Editorial Board - composed of eminent scholars covering a wide range of humanistic and social disciplines and natural, technological and biomedical sciences - evaluates the proposal and either accepts it for publication, rejects it or decides to request a revision from the author. The decisions of the Board are based on a peer review; this is carried out by the members of the Board, where appropriately qualified, or is entrusted to one or more academic referees external to the Board.
Publication proposals can be submitted to the FUP Editorial Board directly by the author, or by a recognised Scientific Committee following submission of a plan approved by the FUP Editorial Board.
The ultimate decision regarding publication nevertheless lies with the FUP Editorial Board.
The names of the members of the FUP Editorial Board and those of the Scientific Committees belonging to the FUP Catalogue (over thirty) are published in the online FUP Catalogue.
The members of the Scientific Committees belonging to the FUP Catalogue are also indicated on a specific page of each publication (rear of half title page) .